It was a great relief to have made it to London. I was, though, very surprised to be greeted as soon as I walked into the terminal building by a cameraman and interviewer from ITN who had been alerted to my arrival. So as I walked down the corridor towards immigration there was a cameraman walking backwards shining a very bright light towards me while someone walked beside me waving a microphone in my face and asking me how it felt to be free, and what the experience was like, and did I think that India was doing a good thing in helping to liberate East Pakistan. I answered as best I could and I learned later that I had appeared on News at 10 for about 30 seconds.
I collected my small amount of baggage and when I went through into the arrivals hall I was very pleasantly surprised to be warmly greeted by Anna and several of the Omega people from London. I was taken for a meal, asked lots of questions, sat next to Anna who held my hand, and then at the end we went back togetherto her same bedsitter.
Two days after my arrival in London, on 16 December, the Pakistan Army in the East surrendered to the joint forces of the Indian army and the Mukti Bahini in Dacca, and the state of Bangladesh was proclaimed. The war had lasted only 14 days. I had been released from imprisonment on the fourth day, as the first major town of Bangladesh had fallen to the joint forces. While I was celebrating freedom, getting a new passport, dining at the Consulate in Calcutta, travelling across India by train, exploring Bombay and flying out in the early hours, being delayed in Cairo, and arriving in London, the inevitable fate of the Pakistan Army in the east had become increasingly clear. Despite a UN General Assembly resolution calling for a ceasefire in the second week of the war, resulting from a Soviet veto on a similar resolution in the Security Council, and strong words from the United States about India’s ‘aggression’, the wheels of history were turning inexorably.
THE Nixon Administration drew a fusillade of criticism last week for its policy on India and Pakistan. Two weeks ago, when war broke out between the two traditional enemies, a State Department spokesman issued an unusually blunt statement, placing the burden of blame on India. Soon after that, U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations George Bush branded the Indian action as “aggression”—a word that Washington subsequently but lamely explained had not been “authorized.”
Senator Edward Kennedy declared that the Administration had turned a deaf ear for eight months to “the brutal and systematic repression of East Bengal by the Pakistani army,” and now was condemning “the response of India toward an increasingly desperate situation on its eastern borders.” Senators Edmund Muskie and Hubert Humphrey echoed Kennedy’s charges.
The critics were by no means limited to ambitious politicians. In the New York Times, John P. Lewis, onetime U.S. A.I.D. director in India (1964-69) and now dean of the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton, wrote: “We have managed to align ourselves with the wrong side of about as big and simple a moral issue as the world has seen lately; and we have sided with a minor military dictatorship against the world’s second largest nation.” In Britain, the conservative London Daily Telegraph accused Washington of “a blundering diplomatic performance which can have few parallels.”
{….}
Because of blunders in both substance and tone, the U.S. has, 1) destroyed whatever chance it had to be neutral in the East Asian conflict; 2) tended to reinforce the Russia-India, China-Pakistan lineup; 3) seemingly placed itself morally and politically on the side of a particularly brutal regime, which, moreover, is an almost certain loser; and 4) made a shambles of its position on the subcontinent.
Time Magazine 20 December 1971
With the exception of a deeply embarrassed United States, most countries of the world, once it was clear that India had no intention of annexing East Pakistan into India, celebrated a people, very poor, certainly, but with a fiercely burning national sense of self and worth, gain their rightful place in the world.
JAI Bangla! Jai Bangla!” From the banks of the great Ganges and the broad Brahmaputra, from the emerald rice fields and mustard-colored hills of the countryside, from the countless squares of countless villages came the cry. “Victory to Bengal! Victory to Bengal!” They danced on the roofs of buses and marched down city streets singing their anthem Golden Bengal. They brought the green, red and gold banner of Bengal out of secret hiding places to flutter freely from buildings, while huge pictures of their imprisoned leader, Sheik Mujibur Rahman, sprang up overnight on trucks, houses and signposts. As Indian troops advanced first to Jessore, then to Comilla, then to the outskirts of the capital of Dacca, small children clambered over their trucks and Bengalis everywhere cheered and greeted the soldiers as liberators.
{….}
The first city to fall was Jessore. TIME’S William Stewart, who rode into the key railroad junction with the Indian troops, cabled: “Jessore, India’s first strategic prize, fell as easily as a mango ripened by a long Bengal summer. It shows no damage from fighting. In fact, the Pakistani 9th Division headquarters had quit Jessore days before the Indian advance, and only four battalions were left to face the onslaught.
“Nevertheless, two Pakistani battalions slipped away, while the other two were badly cut up. The Indian army was everywhere wildly cheered by the Bengalis, who shouted: ‘Jai Bangla!’ and ‘Indira Gandhi Zindabad! [Long Live Indira Gandhi!].’ In Jhingergacha, a half-deserted city of about 5,000 nearby, people gather to tell of their ordeal. The Pakistanis shot us when we didn’t understand,’ said one old man. ‘But they spoke Urdu and we speak Bengali.’ ”
{….}
In New Delhi, the mood was not so much jingoism as jubilation that India’s main goal — the establishment of a government in East Bengal that would en sure the return of the refugees — was accomplished so quickly. There was little surprise when Prime Minister Gandhi announced to both houses of Parliament early last week that India would become the first government to recognize Bangladesh. Still, members thumped their desks, cheered loudly and jumped in the aisles to express their delight. “The valiant struggle of the people of Bangladesh in the face of tremendous odds has opened a new chapter of heroism in the history of freedom movements,” Mrs. Gandhi said. “The whole world is now aware that [Bangladesh] reflects the will of an overwhelming majority of the people, which not many governments can claim to represent.”
{….}
As a Bangladesh official put it at the opening of the new nation’s first diplomatic mission in New Delhi last week: “It is a dream come true, but you must also remember that we went through a nightmare.”
Time Magazine 20 December 1971
The new nation of Bangladesh became the 8th most populous in the world. The new government, by April 1972 led by Sheik Mujibur Rahman, struggled with the fundamental problems of the country, including increasing corruption. In the aftermath of a famine in 1974, he banned all opposition parties and declared himself president in a one party state. Seven months later, on 15 August 1975 (ironically Indian Independence Day), he, and most of his family, were assassinated. After the 1971 war, the Military regime of Yahya Khan fell immediately and Zulfikar Ali Bhutto became Prime Minister in the Pakistan that remained. He was hanged by a different military dictator, Zia al Huq, in 1979. His daughter, Benazir, died in a bombing in 2007. General Tikka Khan, ‘The Butcher of Bengal’, mastermind and leader of the repression in the east, became, a few years later, the head of the section which developed Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal.
And so my adventure ended. There was still an interview on the Today programme, an interview with Radio London, several print paper interviews, the meeting with Lord Brockway, an several visits to the Hospital for Tropical Diseases. And then it was Christmas and New Year with Anna and some friends, and then it was 1972, and my year of living dangerously had ended, and I was ready to face a new one.